๐๐ค ๐ข Startupโcorporate collaboration: still treated as an experiment.
But the real problem isnโt speed. ๐๐ญโ๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ข๐ ๐ง.
What actually works when companies stop โpiloting innovationโ and start operationalising it.
The World Economic Forum (WEF) makes one point painfully clear:
Most collaborations fail not because startups are immature or corporates are slow but because ๐ข๐ง๐ง๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐ญ๐๐ ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐จ ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ง๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ instead of being structurally embedded.
What shifts the odds?
๐น ๐ท๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ ๐ฃ๐๐๐ก๐ข๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ข๐๐๐ , not ad-hoc project teams
๐น๐ถ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ค๐๐๐๐ โ๐๐, not โinnovation theatreโ
๐น๐ท๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ค๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ข๐ก๐๐๐, not buried under governance layers
๐น๐
๐๐ ๐ ๐ก๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, not as a reputational threat
In other words:
Speed vs. scale is a false dichotomy.
โ๏ธ The real tension is ๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ฏ๐ฌ. ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐จ๐ฅ and control usually wins by default.
Thatโs why platforms like BRAIN CONNECT Prague matter.
Not as matchmaking tools.
But asย ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ฅ๐๐ฒ๐๐ซ๐ฌ between startup logic and corporate reality:
๐ธaligning incentives
๐ธsetting realistic time horizons
๐ธand creating space where failure produces learning, not blame
Startupโcorporate collaboration shouldnโt be a gamble.
๐๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ญ๐๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ.
๐ Weโll share the WEF article in the first comment for those who want to go deeper into how venturing squads are changing the game.


