Organisations donโt lose innovation because they reject it.
They lose it ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ฐ๐ก๐๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐๐๐ฌ between:
๐ธ departments
๐ธ budgets
๐ธ mandates
๐ธ and risk ownership
This is where promising initiatives quietly slow down, get parked, or wait for โthe right momentโ.
Not because people donโt care.
But because ๐ง๐จ ๐ฌ๐ฒ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ฆ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ข๐ ๐ง๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐๐ซ๐ซ๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง๐ง๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ง๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐ฌ.
Ideas that donโt fit existing processes need:
๐ explicit ownership
๐ protected time
๐ and permission to challenge the status quo without being penalised for it
Without that, even strong initiatives donโt fail loudly.
๐๐ก๐๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ฉ๐ฉ๐๐๐ซ.
At BRAIN CONNECT Prague, we donโt treat innovation as a one-off initiative.
We focus on ๐๐๐ฌ๐ข๐ ๐ง๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ that allow ideas to survive long enough to prove their value in the real world.
๐๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ฒ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐, ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐, ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐๐.
๐ฌ A question worth asking:
๐โ๐๐โ ๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐ก๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ก๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐โ๐ก ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ก ๐๐ข๐๐๐ก๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ก ๐๐๐๐๐ข๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ค๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐ค๐๐๐?


